And to genealogies that have no end.1 He calls them endless, because vain curiosity has no limit, but continually falls from labyrinth to labyrinth. Which produce questions. He judges of doctrine by the fruit; for everything that does not edify ought to be rejected, although it has no other fault; and everything that is of no avail but for raising contentions, ought to be doubly condemned. And such are all the subtle questions on which ambitious men exercise their faculties. Let us, therefore, remember,
Page 24